From: | "Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun(at)nsasia(dot)co(dot)th> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 |
Date: | 2005-12-20 04:35:29 |
Message-ID: | 43A7EC77.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From contrib/lo I found that it has something difference between old and new version of PostgreSQL. And I'm sure that I already tick on Large Object (lo) option when I install.
How can I manage on difference function?
:::New Version:::
DOMAIN lo AS pg_catalog.oid;
FUNCTION lo_oid(lo) RETURNS pg_catalog.oid AS 'SELECT $1::pg_catalog.oid' LANGUAGE SQL STRICT IMMUTABLE;
FUNCTION lo_manage() RETURNS pg_catalog.trigger AS '$libdir/lo' LANGUAGE C;
:::Old Version:::
FUNCTION lo_in(cstring) RETURNS lo AS '$libdir/lo' LANGUAGE C IMMUTABLE STRICT;
FUNCTION lo_out(lo) RETURNS cstring AS '$libdir/lo' LANGUAGE C IMMUTABLE STRICT;
TYPE lo ( INTERNALLENGTH = 4, EXTERNALLENGTH = variable, INPUT = lo_in, OUTPUT = lo_out);
FUNCTION lo_oid(lo) RETURNS oid AS '$libdir/lo' LANGUAGE C IMMUTABLE STRICT;
FUNCTION oid(lo) RETURNS oid AS '$libdir/lo', 'lo_oid' LANGUAGE C IMMUTABLE STRICT;
CAST (lo as oid) WITH FUNCTION oid(lo) AS IMPLICIT;
FUNCTION lo(oid) RETURNS lo AS '$libdir/lo' LANGUAGE C IMMUTABLE STRICT;
CAST (oid as lo) WITH FUNCTION lo(oid) AS IMPLICIT;
FUNCTION lo_manage() RETURNS trigger AS '$libdir/lo' LANGUAGE C;
>>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 12/14/2005 22:06:33 >>>
"Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun(at)nsasia(dot)co(dot)th> writes:
> I think I use contrib/lo type for manage lo. What is wrong?
You need to use the 8.1 version of contrib/lo, not any previous version.
You might find that the easiest way to manage this is to create an empty
database, load the 8.1 contrib/lo definitions by running lo.sql, then
restoring from your pg_dump backup. You'll see some complaints about
duplicate function definitions but these can be ignored.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jess Balint | 2005-12-20 05:11:43 | Re: Lock issue when trying to vacuum db |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-20 04:32:03 | Re: localization problem (and solution) |