Re: Installation trouble - Solved

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Weberhofer GmbH <office(at)weberhofer(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com
Subject: Re: Installation trouble - Solved
Date: 2005-12-17 17:53:04
Message-ID: 43A45080.3060404@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>The distinction is that RPMs and pginstaller are port-specific, binary
>distributions.
>
>
So they can't be considered official port releases for the PGDG? They
are not "forks".
Or, are you saying that the only official PGDG release is the source?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andre Truter 2005-12-17 18:02:04 Re: DBlink documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-17 17:49:47 Re: Installation trouble - Solved