Re: Which qsort is used

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Qingqing,
>
>
> On 12/15/05 6:33 PM, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote:
>
>>Thanks for Greg "let" me take a second look at qsortB.c - there is
>>paste-and-copy error there, so when it perform recursive sort, it calls
>>glibc's qsort ... Really sorry, and feel a little bit gun-shy now ...
>>
>>After I re-tested it, now BSD qsort is the obvious winner in most
>>situations.
>
>
> :-D
>
> Can you post the new results like the last post?
>
> - Luke
>

Here is a result from a dual 0.8G x86 running Freebsd 6.0-RELEASE:

http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/markir/download/sort-fbsd.out

(after patching the bug with qsortB calling qsort). Clearly in this
case, there is no glibc version, hence I've relabeled the 1st case as
"native qsort".

Cheers

Mark