| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and COPY BINARY |
| Date: | 2005-12-15 01:28:53 |
| Message-ID: | 43A0C6D5.9030206@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>Examining why psql won't do sensible stuff with COPY BINARY, I realized
>>that psql still uses PQgetline, which is marked obsolete since 7.4.
>>Is this intentional or just a "never reviewed because it works"?
>
> There wasn't any obvious bang for the buck in rewriting it.
The obvious one (and why I submitted a patch - see previous email) was
for people who use the psql source code as sample code, which is what I
was doing at the time for PHP 5.1's PostgreSQL module.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-12-15 01:34:16 | Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-12-15 01:27:04 | Re: psql and COPY BINARY |