| From: | Gianluca Riccardi <ml-reader(at)moonwatcher(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DB design and foreign keys |
| Date: | 2005-12-14 10:27:47 |
| Message-ID: | 439FF3A3.7080909@moonwatcher.it |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
[cut]
> Given this table layout, I'm gonna take a wild guess and ask if you're
> coming from MySQL and expecting the second serial order_code to be a
> sub-autoincrement to id?
>
no, always used PostgreSQL, but i'm having a deeper approach now, until
now i've been using th ORDBMS in a very 'easy' manner :(
> If so, it won't be. That's a mysqlism. If
> you want something similar, you'll have to implement it yourself, and
> note that such a thing tends to be a poor performer with lots of
> parallel updates, and it can also be susceptible to race conditions if
> no locking is used.
>
>
thank you, regards,
Gianluca Riccardi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gianluca Riccardi | 2005-12-14 15:08:05 | Re: DB design and foreign keys |
| Previous Message | Gianluca Riccardi | 2005-12-14 10:26:55 | Re: DB design and foreign keys |