| From: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Regression test horology failure |
| Date: | 2005-12-13 19:51:17 |
| Message-ID: | 439F2635.7010700@gmx.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane schrieb:
> "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
>
>>The tests fail for PST/PDT in 2034.
>
>
> This probably indicates that you've got TZ data reflecting the new US
> DST rules. We have not updated the pre-8.0 regression test results
> to deal with that.
You're right as far as I can tell. 8.1 has the expected output.
The failing tests are different instances of this basic example:
Expected:
Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST + 34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PST
Here (and PostgreSQL >= 8.x):
Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST + 34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PDT
Still, I don't understand why March 15th should be day light saving
time. But hey, I don't live in the PST8PDT time zone. ;-)
Thanks for your answer.
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-12-13 19:53:13 | Re: Which qsort is used |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-13 18:51:26 | Re: Which qsort is used |