Re: Regression test horology failure

From: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression test horology failure
Date: 2005-12-13 19:51:17
Message-ID: 439F2635.7010700@gmx.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane schrieb:
> "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
>
>>The tests fail for PST/PDT in 2034.
>
>
> This probably indicates that you've got TZ data reflecting the new US
> DST rules. We have not updated the pre-8.0 regression test results
> to deal with that.

You're right as far as I can tell. 8.1 has the expected output.

The failing tests are different instances of this basic example:

Expected:
Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST + 34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PST

Here (and PostgreSQL >= 8.x):
Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST + 34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PDT

Still, I don't understand why March 15th should be day light saving
time. But hey, I don't live in the PST8PDT time zone. ;-)

Thanks for your answer.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2005-12-13 19:53:13 Re: Which qsort is used
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-13 18:51:26 Re: Which qsort is used