From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_relation_size locking |
Date: | 2005-12-12 15:27:04 |
Message-ID: | 439D96C8.6090405@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
>>Until recently, pg_relation_size used SearchSysCache to locate the
>>relation to examine, and calculated the file location from that
>>information. Starting with dbsize.c V1.5 (committed after Beta2),
>>relation_open(.., AccessShareLock) is used. This is very unfortunate
>>because it will not allow to observe a table growing while it is
>>populated, e.g. with a lengthy COPY; pg_relation_size will be blocked.
>
>
> Nonsense.
Ahem.
I'm running Slony against a big replication set. While slon runs COPY
foo(colnamelist) FROM STDIN, I can't execute pg_relation_size(foo_oid).
pg_locks will show that the AccessShareLock on foo is not granted.
Problem is gone with reverted dbsize.c
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-12 15:45:04 | Re: pg_relation_size locking |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-12 15:23:19 | Re: pg_relation_size locking |