From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Carlos Moreno <moreno(at)mochima(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer |
Date: | 2005-12-11 23:52:33 |
Message-ID: | 439CBBC1.2030700@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-benchmarks pgsql-chat pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Actually, there is probably comparatively little to gain from making it
a builtin. And SHA1 is already there in the pgcrypto contrib module.
Presumably if we wanted a builtin we would start from that code base.
cheers
andrew
Carlos Moreno wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm very new to this list -- I've been using and advocating PostgreSQL
> for
> no less than 4 or 5 years now, and have participated in some of the other
> mailing lists, but never on this one.
>
> My question is (short version): how would one go about adding a new
> (built-in) function to PostgreSQL?
>
> Long-ish version:
>
> I know the answer "in theory" -- one goes through the source code, find
> out how it all works, and modify/add the code to add or fix whatever
> feature we want.
>
> I guess my point in here would be rather a "feature request" -- except
> that I'd find it pretty exciting to implement it myself, and then propose
> the new feature by volunteering the implementation that I already wrote
> (seems like the spirit of open-source communities, right?) -- then of
> course, it would be subject to consensus, whether or not the feature
> makes sense and the implementation is good enough.
>
> I'm interested in adding additional hash functions -- PG supports, as
> part
> of the built-in SQL functions, MD5 hashing. So, for instance, I can
> simply
> type, at a psql console, the following:
>
> select md5('abc');
>
> My "feature request" (which again, I'd like to implement it myself) would
> be the ability to do:
>
> select sha1('xyz'), sha256('etc');
>
> (At least these two -- maybe for completeness it would be good to have
> sha224, 384, and 512, but I guess SHA1 and SHA-256 would be a very good
> and sound starting point)
>
> So, can you offer some advice or pointers on how to go about that?
>
> I started by doing a search for the string md5 through all the source
> code -- the problem is, md5 shows up in many many many places (it is
> part of the authentication protocol, among other things), so I got a
> little bit lost searching through it all.
>
> I wonder if you have some documents specifically aimed at providing
> advice and documentation for prospective developers (or for people
> that want to "tweak" the source code to fix/tuneup or add functionality),
> I guess that would be great for me in this case.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-12 00:02:08 | Re: Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-12-11 23:45:26 | Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-12 00:02:08 | Re: Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-12-11 23:45:26 | Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-12 00:02:08 | Re: Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-12-11 23:45:26 | Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-12 00:02:08 | Re: Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-12-11 23:45:26 | Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer |