From: | Kaloyan Iliev <news1(at)faith(dot)digsys(dot)bg> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Query not using index |
Date: | 2005-12-09 16:39:09 |
Message-ID: | 4399B32D.4010508@faith.digsys.bg |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi all,
Thanks for the reply. I made some more test and find out that the
problem is with the <<= operator for the network type. Can I create
index which to work with <<=. Because if I use = the index is used. But
not for <<=.
iplog=# explain analyze SELECT *
iplog-# FROM croute
iplog-# WHERE '193.68.0.10/32' <<=
network;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on croute (cost=0.00..707.27 rows=4891 width=103) (actual
time=10.313..29.621 rows=2 loops=1)
Filter: ('193.68.0.10/32'::cidr <<= network)
Total runtime: 29.729 ms
(3 rows)
iplog=# explain analyze SELECT *
iplog-# FROM croute
iplog-# WHERE '193.68.0.10/32' = network;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using croute_network_all on croute (cost=0.00..17.99 rows=4
width=103) (actual time=0.053..0.059 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ('193.68.0.10/32'::cidr = network)
Total runtime: 0.167 ms
(3 rows)
Waiting for replies.
Thanks to all in advance.
Kaloyan Iliev
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Benkendorf | 2005-12-10 11:34:23 | Is RAID10 the best choice? |
Previous Message | Kaloyan Iliev | 2005-12-09 16:38:42 | Re: Query not using index |