From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: invalidating cached plans |
Date: | 2005-04-02 16:44:39 |
Message-ID: | 4396.1112460279@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes
>> PostgreSQL should invalidate a cached query plan when one of the objects
>> the plan depends upon is modified.
> It just comes into my mind that current cache invalidation implementation
> may need to consider the future query result cache.
There isn't likely ever to be a query result cache. The idea has been
proposed before and rejected before: too much complexity and overhead
for too little prospective gain. If you need such a thing it makes
more sense to do it on the application side and save a network round
trip.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-02 16:51:19 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-04-02 16:27:26 | Re: Debugging deadlocks |