From: | Rodrigo Gonzalez <rjgonzale(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Poul Møller Hansen <freebsd(at)pbnet(dot)dk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow COUNT |
Date: | 2005-12-02 16:49:42 |
Message-ID: | 43907B26.3020908@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I answer here so each one can help you.
Cannot understand what you mean....index is numbered? Are you talking
about "autoincrement" as called in mysql? use sequences please
Best regards
Rodrigo
Poul Møller Hansen wrote:
> Rodrigo Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Poul,
>>
>> 2 things....first, why do you think it will have an impact on inserts?
>>
>> And the second one....use InnoDb tables in MySQL, and you will have
>> the same than with PostgreSQL, it's because of MVCC
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Rodrigo
>>
>
> If the index is numbered, I assume or rather guessing that the indexes
> must be renumbered at inserts.
>
> I was not trying to favourite MySQL to PostgreSQL, I prefer PostgreSQL
> to MySQL at any time, I was just wondering why it was much faster in
> MySQL and how I can achieve the same result in PostgreSQL ?
>
>
> Regards, Poul
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Frankel | 2005-12-02 16:50:17 | Re: pg_restore error |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 16:47:22 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |