From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Date: | 2005-12-01 04:22:52 |
Message-ID: | 438E7A9C.3010201@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
>>
>> I see this as an excellent reason to draw a bright, sharp line between
>> what vendors support and what the community as a whole does,
>> especially where individual community members wear another hat.
>
>
> So, if Sun, SRA, Pervasive, Command Prompt, etc were to submit a patch
> for v7.2, we'd refuse it? I think not ...
Oh but you should. The community has enough to worry about.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 04:38:48 | Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-01 04:20:52 | Re: Problem with COPY CSV |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-12-01 05:15:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-12-01 03:56:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |