Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types
Date: 1998-11-02 16:07:13
Message-ID: 4387.910022833@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> ... we have
> already over-shoot our release date by 1 month *because* of this feature.
> In the future, as has been discussed by the core, this will not happen
> again...we should never have held up the release for the INET/CIDR types.

Well, maybe not, but don't beat yourselves up about it. An awful lot of
small but good things have happened in the last month in the way of bug
fixes and configure improvements. Not to mention docs. If you'd
released 6.4 a month ago, it would've been of substantially lower
quality than what will go out the door this week. I don't think the
delay was such a bad thing.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-11-02 16:46:21 Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-11-02 15:50:38 Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types