Re: pgstattuple_approx for toasted table

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Mariel Cherkassky <mariel(dot)cherkassky(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgstattuple_approx for toasted table
Date: 2019-03-04 05:21:39
Message-ID: 43864a0e35504ffc6047dd90eaf648287ed75e65.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
> I was testing pgstattuple and I realized that pgstattuple is working on toasted table but pgstattuple_approx is raising the next error msg :
>
> ERROR: "pg_toast_18292" is not a table or materialized view
>
> ahm, is that because the pgstattuple_approx uses visibility map ? Can someone explain ? tnx.

You are right; here is the code:

/*
* We support only ordinary relations and materialised views, because we
* depend on the visibility map and free space map for our estimates about
* unscanned pages.
*/
if (!(rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION ||
rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_MATVIEW))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not a table or materialized view",
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kristi Anderson 2019-03-04 18:38:00 2019 Database Trends – SQL vs. NoSQL, Top Databases, Single vs. Multiple Database Use
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-03-03 20:27:13 Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables