Re: shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?
Date: 2009-09-17 21:31:16
Message-ID: 4385.1253223076@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> basically - shouldn't this command raise error instead of creating index
> named "concurrently"?

No. That would mean that "concurrently" is a reserved word.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Annita 2009-09-18 09:45:52 BUG #5063: MS Access crashes by quiting after linking tables with PostgreSQL
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2009-09-17 19:59:06 shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?