| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: make_restrictinfo() failed to attach |
| Date: | 2005-11-21 22:28:37 |
| Message-ID: | 43824A15.60700@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>isn't a test for a specific
>case better than none at all? Is the concern how long make check takes?
>
>
It shouldn't be, since we can (and do) have multiple regression test
sets. If there are tests that take too long for normal use, let's make a
"takes a long time" set and a new Makefile target for it - we'll add it
to the buildfarm suite so automated testing (which shouldn't care how
long it takes) will do the heavy work for us.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User Gsmet | 2005-11-21 22:43:02 | pgfouine - pgfouine: add common LOG line that should be ignored |
| Previous Message | User Gsmet | 2005-11-21 22:23:44 | pgfouine - pgfouine: ignore common errors |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-21 22:35:15 | Re: Heading to Mexico |
| Previous Message | Bob Ippolito | 2005-11-21 22:24:21 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 catalog corruption |