From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: drop if exists - first piece |
Date: | 2005-11-19 17:48:09 |
Message-ID: | 437F6559.1010602@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>New test seems reasonable.
>
>
done.
>A few other minor comments:
>
>* The NOTICEs should probably not carry an ERRCODE; usually you just
>want a notice to go out with the default "not an error" SQLSTATE.
>
>
done.
>* The "Assert(missing_ok)"s are a waste of code space --- if
>ereport(ERROR) ever returned, there would be vast swaths of the backend
>that fail, so there's no point in asserting it only here. They also
>make the reader stop to wonder why they are there, which is probably a
>bigger objection.
>
>
done, but I left one with a modified test to reflect what we are really
testing, i.e. that we didn't fall of the end of a message table.
>* It's probably not a good idea to assume that "IF" is a safe name for
>a parser symbol --- too much risk of collision with other macros.
>I'd suggest "IF_P".
>
>
done.
Thanks for the review.
Committed as above. I will probably do DROP DATABASE IF EXISTS shortly,
but anyone who wants to jump in on others is welcome to.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-11-19 22:55:15 | Re: DROP OWNED again |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-19 00:59:04 | Re: DROP OWNED again |