| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in predicate indexes? |
| Date: | 2005-11-18 21:07:41 |
| Message-ID: | 437E429D.3010209@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>This is a known (although perhaps not well documented) limitation of the
>predicate testing logic. You do not need a cast in the query, though,
>only in the index's WHERE condition.
>
>
O.k. cool just wanted to make sure I wasn't the only one :).
Joshua D. Drake
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-18 21:53:11 | Re: order by, for custom types |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-11-18 20:03:36 | Re: Improving count(*) |