From: | Johnny Ljunggren <johnny(at)navtek(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Choosing PostgreSQL as the database for our next project |
Date: | 2005-11-14 11:29:03 |
Message-ID: | 437874FF.6080809@navtek.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
William Yu wrote:
> Johnny Ljunggren wrote:
>
>> 1. Replication - multimaster
>> I'll try to explain the setup to the best of my ability:
>> Three centers:
>> Main center - database with a backup database
>> Center 1 - database with a backup database
>> Center 2 - database with a backup database (same as center 1)
Hmm, okay. We're now looking at another, simpler, way to do it. The same
setup but the clients on Center 1/2 will connect directly to the Main
center (2Mb leased line). The databases on Center 1/2 will then just be
a replica of the Main databases.
The biggest issue though is what happens when the lines go down:
1. connect to local database server
2. line comes up => changes to local database sent to main database
3. connect to main database server
From what I understand this will be possible but I may need to roll my
own replication code to handle data conflict issues? Especially since
center 1/2 may be down at the same time and then might change the same data.
How do the tools for this compare against the ones from Oracle?
--
Johnny Ljunggren, Vestlia 6, 3080 HOLMESTRAND, 918 50 411
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hugo | 2005-11-14 13:42:07 | odbc and psql 8.1.0 |
Previous Message | Dinesh Pandey | 2005-11-14 11:06:47 | Connection Oracle database from Postgres function |