Re: Registry

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Miha Radej <miha(dot)radej(at)siix(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Registry
Date: 2005-11-11 17:46:47
Message-ID: 4374D907.7050308@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
>>Sent: 11 November 2005 16:51
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Miha Radej; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: Registry
>>
>>
>>>I'm not convinced it was actually worth the change - it's
>>
>>not like it
>>
>>> was something that the user needed to hack normally, or
>>
>>would cause
>>
>>>performance issues.
>>
>>If you add a schema restriction you'll understand why I did this.
>
>
> Ahh, yes, I see!
>
>
>>Alternatively, we could try to convince Tom to extend pg_database and
>>pg_schema :-)
>
>
> Err, yuh. You go ahead...

No, *you* wear the project leader hat, your turn :->

Ok, thou it was undoubltly a really brilliant idea of mine to delete
pre-1.5 entries, it might be a good idea to keep them for now, just to
please you :-)

Regards,
Andreas

>
> :-)
>
> /D

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message svn 2005-11-11 21:25:05 SVN Commit by dpage: r4739 - trunk/pgadmin3/pkg/src
Previous Message svn 2005-11-11 17:42:43 SVN Commit by andreas: r4737 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . src/include src/utils