From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hide databases |
Date: | 2005-11-11 15:05:58 |
Message-ID: | 4374B356.5080905@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
>>Andreas Pflug
>>Sent: 11 November 2005 11:19
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Hide databases
>>
>>Andreas Pflug wrote:
>>
>>>First of all, stay on the lists!
>>>Since this is new stuff, it should go to -hackers.
>>>
>>>Uwe Dalluege wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>do you realised it (hide databases) in 1.5.0 Nov 9 2005
>>
>>win32-version ?
>>
>>>>I have installed it but I could not see new behaviour.
>>>>All databases and schematas are shown.
>>>
>>>
>>>See properties of db or schema to enter the restriction.
>>
>>Correction: property of server to enter db restriction, property of db
>>to enter schema restriction.
>
>
> Out of interest, what's the format of the restriction string? Delimited
> list, SQL restriction, regexp?
something like datname=user (validity is checked)
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-11 16:23:16 | Re: problem adding a foreign key in v1.5 and a |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-11 13:26:55 | Re: Hide databases |