Re: generic builtin functions

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

>On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:02:58PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>I am looking at creating a few generic functions builtin for the enum
>>stuff. These would be tied to each enum type as it is created. However,
>>they should not really appear in pg_proc initially, as there wouldn't be
>>any enum types to tie them to anyway. But I want them to have reserved
>>oids and appear in the list of builtins.
>>
>>
>
>Why? What's wrong with creating the functions when people use the
>module, like every other module in contrib? Is there a reason you need
>fixed oids?
>
>
>
>

This is not intended for contrib. The whole point of the exercise is to
have language support, which means either it's builtin or it doesn't
happen. See my email with a general outline from a few days ago.

cheers

andrew