Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0

From: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
To: "John Vincent" <pgsql-performance(at)lusis(dot)org>
Cc: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, "PGSQL Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0
Date: 2006-06-14 17:29:29
Message-ID: 43719.216.41.12.254.1150306169.squirrel@webmail.webopticon.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, June 14, 2006 1:04 pm, John Vincent wrote:

> I know it is but that's what we need for some of our queries. Our ETL
> tool (informatica) and BI tool (actuate) won't let us set those things as
> part of our jobs. We need it for those purposes. We have some really nasty
> queries that will be fixed in our new server.

You could modify pgpool to insert the necessary set commands and point the
tools at pgpool.

-M

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Vincent 2006-06-14 18:11:19 Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0
Previous Message Mischa Sandberg 2006-06-14 17:06:20 Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?