Re: Spinlock can be released twice in procsignal.c

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: "Maksim(dot)Melnikov" <m(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: Spinlock can be released twice in procsignal.c
Date: 2025-02-26 04:08:53
Message-ID: 43712AD8-AF1C-4E2D-9AC7-A37BA7A752B6@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 26 Feb 2025, at 00:34, Maksim.Melnikov <m(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> In applied patch I removed spinlock release in if clause.

Looks like the oversight in 9d9b9d4. IMO the fix is correct.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sagar Shedge 2025-02-26 04:09:13 Re: Extend postgres_fdw_get_connections to return remote backend pid
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2025-02-26 04:05:57 Re: Statistics Import and Export