| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 |
| Date: | 2005-11-06 17:10:06 |
| Message-ID: | 436E38EE.2000708@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
>>David Fetter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:01:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
>>>>performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
>>>>script would probably crash a Windows machine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Ouch. In light of this, are we *sure* what we've got a is a candidate
>>>for release?
>>>
>>>
>>Good point. It is something we would fix in a minor release, so it
>>doesn't seem worth doing another RC just for that.
>>
>>
>
>Will this be documented in the release notes? If we put unimplemented
>features in TODO, where do we list things we regard as bugs?
>
>
>
>
No need, I think. It was patched 2 days ago.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2005-11-06 18:11:55 | Re: pgInstaller 8.1 built |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-06 17:01:43 | Re: PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-06 17:17:20 | Re: Performance PG 8.0 on dual opteron / 4GB / 3ware Raid5 / Debian?? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-06 16:31:18 | Re: 8.1 iss |