| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA |
| Date: | 2005-11-04 17:47:08 |
| Message-ID: | 436B4A3D020000250000047B@gwmta.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I don't know if this fills in any of the gaps, but...
We passed regression tests with 8.1RC1 on dual hyperthreaded
Xeon systems. One had SUSE 9.3 Professional; the other had
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition (Service Pack 1).
Both had 8 GB RAM and six disk drives set up as RAID 5.
Configure switches were:
--enable-integer-datetimes
--enable-debug
--disable-nls
On SUSE we also had:
--with-python
If it would be helpful to have more info, let me know.
>>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> >>>
The 8.1 supported-platforms list is looking pretty good, I think -- we
don't have updates for every single combination of OS and hardware,
but we have updates for every OS and at least one instance of all
supported CPU types.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-11-04 17:50:58 | Constraint exclusion description bug? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-11-04 17:39:56 | Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? |