From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ... |
Date: | 2005-10-29 17:41:44 |
Message-ID: | 4363B458.1040007@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>
>>hmm well -HEAD(and 8.0.4 too!) is broken on AIX 5.3ML3:
>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01053.php
>
>
> [ shrug... ] The reports of this problem have not given enough
> information to fix it, and since it's not a regression from 8.0,
> it's not going to hold up the 8.1 release. When and if we receive
> enough info to fix it, we'll gladly do so, but ...
>
> (My guess is that the problem is a compiler or libc bug anyway,
> given that one report says that replacing a memcpy call with
> an equivalent loop makes the failure go away.)
seneca is using gcc 4.0.1, I can reproduce the sig11 with gcc 3.3.2 and
the "hang" with the IBM AIX-compiler so that would indicate a libc-bug ...
If somebody is interested I can provide access to my testbox to help in
debugging ...
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-29 17:42:42 | Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-29 17:36:00 | Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ... |