Re: Sequence dependencies

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sequence dependencies
Date: 2005-10-26 04:44:10
Message-ID: 435F099A.6080305@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>How about it's in the release notes and in adddepend?
>
>
> Hmm, it's currently early Wednesday morning my time, and we were
> thinking of wrapping RC1 Thursday or Friday. An adddepend extension
> is going to get coded and tested when exactly?

Fair enough.

> Also, I'm dubious about the assumption that adddepend still works at
> all, given the author's opinion here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00311.php
> The original plan was to pull it out of this release altogether,
> along with some other contrib modules that really belong on pgfoundry.
> It's currently looking like that won't get done :-( but hacking
> adddepend more in the core CVS is surely pretty far down our priority
> list.

Ok.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-26 04:44:50 Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-26 04:38:06 Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals