Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date: 2005-10-24 00:21:44
Message-ID: 435C2918.8050906@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Here's another version of this patch ;-) I've based it on your patch, so
>>the changes to ovalue etc should sitill be there.
>>
>>
>
>In the spirit of incremental improvement ... I've taken Magnus' version
>and added the proposed change to re-enable Qingqing's patch by skipping
>WaitForSingleObjectEx altogether in the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS code path.
>I also removed WaitForSingleObjectEx in pgwin32_poll_signals(), which
>AFAICS should be just like CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. I think this is what
>we are proposing to actually apply to 8.1beta4. I can't test it though,
>so please check it over...
>
>
>

This patch passes regression and demonstrates the expected speedup on my
machine.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicholas 2005-10-24 00:26:35 BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals changes time zone of result
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-10-23 20:56:10 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance