| From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, ahester(at)galacticltd(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
| Date: | 2005-10-18 19:20:56 |
| Message-ID: | 43554B18.6010704@travelamericas.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Well, it might be a lot of work, but starting with those asking for
support, especially for multiple systems might be a good idea (the
perform list archives perhaps?)
For example, I remember helping a fellow from HP who was having issues
with *some* HP-UX systems not connecting to the UNIX socket properly.
Using gdb we were able to isolate the issue and it seemed to be either a
kernel or standard library issue involving UNIX socket handling (-h
localhost never caused the problem).
So evidently HP is using it for something, but I don't know what.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cesar Villanueva | 2005-10-18 19:21:03 | Re: [translators] Regional Contacts MIA |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2005-10-18 19:15:33 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |