Re: Oracle buys Innobase

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Thomas Beutin <tb(at)laokoon(dot)in-berlin(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-17 02:35:27
Message-ID: 43530DEF.8010908@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/16/2005 5:25 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They do not "own" MaxDB. They license it, just like Innodb.
>>>
>>>
>>> Damn, do they ever have alot of "loose ends" ... what part, exactly,
>>> constitutes "MySQL" vs third party add ons? :)
>>
>> If MaxDB, InnoDB, and DBD engines are all licensed, then they have problems.
>
> Thank god our biggest headaches have been "can we include readline, since
> its GPL?" and "we need to re-write ARC *just in case* IBM decides to
> enforce their patent" :)"

You mean "their eventually someday to be patent".

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CSN 2005-10-17 03:47:53 Anybody using PostGIS?
Previous Message talenat 2005-10-17 01:05:54 Re: Collate problem