| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | stelar(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Open source database comparison |
| Date: | 2005-10-15 14:06:26 |
| Message-ID: | 43510CE2.805@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I saw this open source database comparison:
>http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/29480?trk=DXRSS_LATEST
>
>I'm quite new to PostgreSQL features, but shouldn't PostgreSQL already
>have "SQL stored procedure"? Is "SQL stored procedure" something
>different from the usual stored procedure? And it also mark PostgreSQL
>as having no full-text search. Isn't Tsearch2 being used to do that,
>even though it's not on by default?
>
>I'm just concerned if the matrix is giving the wrong info about
>PostgreSQL :)
>
>
I am a active writer for that site. I will contact my editor.
>
>Regards,
>
>Leonard Soetedjo
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-10-15 14:58:50 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-10-15 14:04:09 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |