| From: | Thomas Beutin <tb(at)laokoon(dot)in-berlin(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-15 10:22:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4350D84D.4090805@laokoon.in-berlin.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
CSN wrote:
> There are some articles on eweek about this:
>
> Oracle Finds the Flaw in MySQL's Business Plan
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1869989,00.asp
>
> "This is what Oracle says in its release: "InnoDB's
> contractual relationship with MySQL comes up for
> renewal next year. Oracle fully expects to negotiate
> an extension of that relationship."
>
> This is what Lubet, former Oracle sales mistress, has
> to say about that: "I'm pretty sure, as an ex-Oracle
> employee, that the sentence in the release about
> 'We'll certainly be happy to renew the contract,' that
> it was written by Larry and that he was laughing out
> loud as he [dictated it]."
Maybe they lost the development of the know how for the only transaction
safe table type of the current mysql releases, but they still "own" the
former Adabas/MaxDB/SAP-DB code with transaction safe tables. Probably
they force the "union" of mysql and SAP-DB code base to keep their
transaction competence, but this are just my €0,02...
Greetings from Berlin,
-tb
--
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2005-10-15 12:32:59 | authentication question |
| Previous Message | Matthew Peter | 2005-10-15 08:57:48 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |