Re: Comments on columns in the pg_catalog tables/views

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on columns in the pg_catalog tables/views
Date: 2005-10-13 08:59:51
Message-ID: 434E2207.2030909@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:

>>Dept of second thoughts: actually, perhaps see if you can generate
>>the pg_description entries from the C comments in the
>>include/catalog header files. There's already a strong motivation
>>to hold those to shorter-than-a-line length, whereas the column
>>descriptions in catalogs.sgml tend to run on a little longer, and
>>wouldn't format nicely in \dt+.
>
>
> My thought is that by the time somebody is doing \dt+ (or equivalent
> in other tools than psql) on a pg_catalog table or view, they need to
> see details and are at most slightly concerned about the formatting.

And not all tools have this formatting issue...
I like the long comments I can take from pg_settings, enabling pgAdmin
to deliver precise information on each config option.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Wegrzyn 2005-10-13 13:24:27 BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2005-10-13 06:57:31 Re: A costing analysis tool