Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-13 08:52:58
Message-ID: 434E206A.8030404@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 10/12/2005 6:18 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jussi Mikkola wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Well, if the PostgreSQL developers would be hired away from the
>>> project with big money, would that not mean, that the project would
>>> be a good path to earn a lot of money. So, new talented developers
>>> could join the project and see that as a path to high salary jobs??
>>
>>
>> Wow, what a twisted way to look at it ... not entirely inaccurate, but
>> twisted :)
>
>
> Oracle could even develop an exceptional interest in keeping PostgreSQL
> alive as it's "future DB engineer forge".

Looks like a good reason why Oracle should sponsor PostgreSQL heavily :-)

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-10-13 16:11:02 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message Chris Travers 2005-10-13 05:44:23 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message han.holl 2005-10-13 10:14:20 Re: How to inject knowledge into a Postgres database
Previous Message Carlos Benkendorf 2005-10-13 08:32:28 Re: Row level locking