Re: PG 8.1beta3 out soon

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 8.1beta3 out soon
Date: 2005-10-12 00:07:09
Message-ID: 434C53AD.7030405@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

>>That would probably work, but it would ONLY deal with the issue for
>>$_TD. In your function $event will still hit this problem.
>>
>>
>
>Well, fixing $_TD would pretty much fix all the problems I've been having.
>As far as "$event", that is in my control and easily fixed by making it
>"our" as well. Some explicit warnings and best practices in the docs would
>be nice.
>
>Tom, can we possibly get that one-word patch into 8.1? It would go a long
>way towards making plperl more intuitive (and useful), and probably head
>off some future "bug" reports.
>
>

"our" only came in with Perl 5.6 ... I don't recall if we have declared
support for earlier versions than that dead yet, although David Fetter
and Joshua Drake have urged us to.

I will add a note somewhere in the docs in the next few days advising
against using named subroutines that refer to lexical variables from the
enclosing scope.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-12 02:42:49 Re: database vacuum from cron hanging
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-11 23:55:27 Re: pg_dump option to dump only functions