Re: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2019-03-05 08:29:42
Message-ID: 4346ac82-3cf3-b852-9028-8e104d7084ad@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/1/19 7:48 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2019/03/01 14:17), Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
>>> Attached patch is wip patch.
>>
>> Is it possible to remove the following patch?
>> Because I registered the patch twice on CF Mar.
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/22/2049/
>
> Please remove the above and keep this:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/22/1779/
>
> which I moved from the January CF to the March one on behalf of him.

I have closed the duplicate entry (#2049) and retained the entry which
contains the CF history (#1779).

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2019-03-05 08:35:13 Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Previous Message David Steele 2019-03-05 08:21:32 Re: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization