Re: pg_autovacuum exceptions question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bowlby <excalibur(at)accesswave(dot)ca>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum exceptions question
Date: 2009-08-17 17:43:47
Message-ID: 4346.1250531027@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Chris Bowlby <excalibur(at)accesswave(dot)ca> writes:
> Thanks for the response. I've run into situations where the database
> has also been removed just before pg_autovacuum was about to check, and
> there by kicks out an error (mainly an aesthetic issue, not really a
> functional issue).

That was fixed some time ago. It's not an argument for adding a
"feature" like this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob Gobeille 2009-08-17 17:46:12 Re: psql command line editor
Previous Message Nuno Mota 2009-08-17 17:43:05 Re: plpython return setof and yield