Re: State of support for back PG branches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date: 2005-09-27 16:26:49
Message-ID: 433972C9.3070301@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Steve,

> The only crystal ball involved is the assumption that if bizgres has
> Neat Stuff(tm) that would be of widespread use in it's development
> tree at that point then the odds are good that it, or something
> functionally equivalent to it, will appear in the 8.2 development
> tree.

It certainly won't be because it hasn't been submitted. All features
for Bizgres PostgreSQL (as opposed to the proprietary MPP) will be sent
to -patches. The main difference will be the release schedule.

--Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-09-27 16:32:14 Re: [HACKERS] \x output blowing up
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-09-27 16:16:07 Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation