Re: State of support for back PG branches

From: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date: 2005-09-27 06:07:04
Message-ID: 4338E188.40809@gmx.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> To my mind the main rationale for continuing to support 7.2 is that it
> was the last pre-schema release, and so people whose apps haven't yet
> been fixed to cope with schemas will be on their own once we drop it.
> While each release has some portability gotchas, I don't think there
> have been any quite that big since then. If we drop support for 7.2,
> it wouldn't be out of the question for us to drop 7.3 and 7.4 too (at
> least not from where I sit ... I'm sure some will differ).

Yes. For one of our application that makes massive use of triggers the
transition from 7.2 to 7.3 was less painful than 7.4 to 8.0. Many of the
triggers were written with the assumption that foreign key checks were
effectively delayed until the end of the calling statement.

Just another opinion. Nevertheless if it's feasible to support 7.4 for a
while, I would recommend it. Also from a marketing statepoint -- having
back branches supported for a visible amount of time increases people's
confident in PostgreSQL and it's stability.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2005-09-27 06:11:23 Re: State of support for back PG branches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-09-27 05:40:07 Re: unchecked malloc