From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: State of support for back PG branches |
Date: | 2005-09-27 04:54:46 |
Message-ID: | 4338D096.5050500@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>[ raised eyebrow... ] Has bizgres obtained a crystal ball from
>somewhere? There is *no* way anyone could provide you anything that
>has any legitimate claim on the name "PG 8.2" three months from now.
>
>
I **think** what he meant was that depending on what Bizgres has done in
the next three
months they may not run 8.1 but run Bizgres instead.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-27 05:03:25 | Re: unchecked malloc |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-27 04:19:36 | Re: State of support for back PG branches |