| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open items list for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-09-26 18:30:09 |
| Message-ID: | 43383E31.8060509@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>>>/contrib move to pgfoundry
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>>Well pgFoundry isn't ready to have a load of code that is
>>that actively maintained put on it. It still needs to be moved to
>>its new servers.
>>
>>
>
>The modules proposed to be moved out aren't actively maintained now;
>if they were we'd probably be keeping them in core.
>
>
>
Speaking as a pgFoundry admin, I would say if they aren't actively
maintained we don't want them either. pgFoundry is not a dumping ground
for modules that are dying. If they are not maintained then drop them.
They can always be recovered from the CVS archive.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-26 18:45:54 | Re: Open items list for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-26 18:23:03 | Re-run query on automatic reconnect |