| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: On Windows, when a file is deleted and another process still has |
| Date: | 2009-09-10 16:59:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4338.1252601961@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> FWIW, the checkpoint is mostly complete at that point, all that's left
> is non-critical cleanup. I admit it's still annoying.
"Mostly complete" isn't good enough, and it's much more than just an
annoyance --- failure to complete checkpoints will lead to disk full,
and other nasty things IIRC. We really need to deal with this.
I wouldn't be too surprised if that rat's nest in InstallXLogFileSegment
isn't right :-(. But we have to treat "file can't be renamed" as a
nonfatal condition on Windows.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-09-10 19:40:54 | Re: pgsql: On Windows, when a file is deleted and another process still has |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-09-10 16:26:26 | Re: pgsql: On Windows, when a file is deleted and another process still has |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-10 17:13:20 | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-09-10 16:28:23 | Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |