Re: Slow search.. quite clueless

From: Yonatan Ben-Nes <da(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
To: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow search.. quite clueless
Date: 2005-09-22 13:31:03
Message-ID: 4332B217.7030004@canaan.co.il
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> On 9/20/05, *Yonatan Ben-Nes* <da(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il <mailto:da(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Im building a site where the users can search for products with up to 4
> diffrent keywords which all MUST match to each product which found as a
> result to the search.
>
> I got 2 tables (which are relevant to the issue :)), one is the product
> table (5 million rows) and the other is the keyword table which hold the
> keywords of each product (60 million rows).
>
> The scheme of the tables is as follows:
>
> Table "public.product"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> ----------------------------+---------------+---------------------
> product_id | text | not null
> product_name | text | not null
> retail_price | numeric(10,2) | not null
> etc...
> Indexes:
> "product_product_id_key" UNIQUE, btree (product_id)
>
> Table "public.keyword"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> -------------+---------------+-----------
> product_id | text | not null
> keyword | text | not null
> Indexes:
> "keyword_keyword" btree (keyword)
>
> The best query which I succeded to do till now is adding the keyword
> table for each keyword searched for example if someone search for "belt"
> & "black" & "pants" it will create the following query:
>
> poweraise.com=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT
> product_id,product_name,product_image_url,short_product_description,long_product_description,discount,discount_type,sale_price,retail_price
> FROM product INNER JOIN keyword t1 USING(product_id) INNER JOIN keyword
> t2 USING(product_id) INNER JOIN keyword t3 USING(product_id) WHERE
> t1.keyword='belt' AND t2.keyword='black' AND t3.keyword='pants'
> LIMIT 13;
>
> QUERY PLAN
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Limit (cost=37734.15..39957.20 rows=13 width=578) (actual
> time=969.798..1520.354 rows=6 loops=1)
> -> Hash Join (cost=37734.15..3754162.82 rows=21733 width=578)
> (actual time=969.794..1520.337 rows=6 loops=1)
> Hash Cond: ("outer".product_id = "inner".product_id)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=18867.07..2858707.34 rows=55309
> width=612) (actual time=82.266..1474.018 rows=156 loops=1)
> -> Hash Join (cost=18867.07..2581181.09 rows=55309
> width=34) (actual time=82.170..1462.104 rows=156 loops=1)
> Hash Cond: ("outer".product_id =
> "inner".product_id)
> -> Index Scan using keyword_keyword on keyword t2
> (cost=0.00..331244.43 rows=140771 width=17) (actual
> time=0.033..1307.167 rows=109007 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (keyword = 'black'::text)
> -> Hash (cost=18851.23..18851.23 rows=6337
> width=17) (actual time=16.145..16.145 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using keyword_keyword on
> keyword t1 (cost=0.00..18851.23 rows=6337 width=17) (actual
> time=0.067..11.050 rows=3294 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (keyword = 'belt'::text)
> -> Index Scan using product_product_id_key on product
> (cost=0.00..5.01 rows=1 width=578) (actual time=0.058..0.060 rows=1
> loops=156)
> Index Cond: (product.product_id =
> "outer".product_id)
> -> Hash (cost=18851.23..18851.23 rows=6337 width=17) (actual
> time=42.863..42.863 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using keyword_keyword on keyword t3
> (cost=0.00..18851.23 rows=6337 width=17) (actual time=0.073..36.120
> rows=3932 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (keyword = 'pants'::text)
> Total runtime: 1521.441 ms
> (17 rows)
>
> Sometimes the query work fast even for 3 keywords but that doesnt help
> me if at other times it take ages....
>
>
>
> Hmm, JOIN on a Huge table with LIMIT. You may be suffering from
> the same problem I had:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-07/msg00345.php
>
> Tom came up with a patch which worked marvellous in my case:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-07/msg00352.php
>
> Try applying this patch, it may solve your problem!
>
> Regards,
> Dawid
>

Great then ill check it if the tsearch2 wont work (testing in about 2-3
hours...).

Thanks alot,
Ben-Nes Yonatan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2005-09-22 13:55:10 Re: Cost based SELECT/UPDATE
Previous Message Howard Cole 2005-09-22 13:19:00 ORDER BY results