Re: Block Size and various FS settings

From: Michael Ben-Nes <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
To: postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block Size and various FS settings
Date: 2005-09-14 08:25:00
Message-ID: 4327DE5C.3080305@canaan.co.il
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

After a week of testing i decided to go with JFS as the FS for Postgres.

im not an expert benchmarker so i hope i initiated the right parameters
in bonnie.

Any way here are the results of bonnie++ & pgbench:

http://www.canaan.co.il/users/miki/stats/stats.html

Cheers

Michael Ben-Nes wrote:

> Hi Everyone
>
>
> Im setting up a machine that will host postgres 8.0.3.
>
> The main tables will be:
>
> Product - around 5 million records.
>
> keywords - around 80 million records.
>
>
> The machine that will host it is IBM x345 with two XEON, 3GB RAM,
> ServeRAID 6i and 6 15K HD.
>
> The OS ( Centos4.1 ) will be installed on the RAID 1 ( 2 HD )
>
> The PG Data will be initialized on RAID 10 ( 4 HD ).
>
>
> should I stick to the default postgres 8192 block size ?
>
> If so, the same 8192 should be applied to the Reiserfs block size ?
>
> and what about the RAID hardware striping size ?
>
>
> Read on the net that pg 8k, reiserfs 8k and Raid strip of 64k will be
> the best.
>
> http://forums.devshed.com/archive/t-33101/Any-RAID-striping-recommendations
>
>
>
> Is it safe to use noatime, nodirtime, notail on the partion of PG data ?
>

--
--------------------------
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
Cel: 972-52-8555757
Fax: 972-4-6990098
http://www.canaan.net.il
--------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wollny 2005-09-14 09:14:25 Upgrade instructions ->7.4.8/8.0.3 incomplete regarding tsearch2
Previous Message Oleg 2005-09-14 08:05:15 how to list rules?