| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
| Date: | 2005-09-13 23:00:41 |
| Message-ID: | 43275A19.8030704@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
> This has been discussed before (try the pgsql-jdbc list archives).
> I believe we concluded that an appropriate fix was to not consider the
> cancel request "done" until the client sees the separate connection
> dropped by the postmaster. libpq's cancel functions wait for that to
> happen, and I thought that JDBC had been fixed as well --- maybe you are
> using an old driver version?
I thought this got done too, but looking at the current JDBC driver code
I don't see it..
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Steele | 2005-09-14 01:38:29 | unsubscribe |
| Previous Message | David | 2005-09-13 22:42:30 | Re: plperl again but different problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-09-14 00:49:31 | Re: Getting vacuum results |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-09-13 22:55:33 | Re: Getting vacuum results |