Re: full outer join performance

From: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full outer join performance
Date: 2005-09-13 18:56:28
Message-ID: 432720DC.8030102@silentmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I see. I think I'm going to restructure my logic so I won't have to use
the outer join after all, but thanks for the pointers anyway.

Tom Lane wrote:

>Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Hrm, as I understand that page, there's not much that can be done about
>>the join order for outer joins. At least, not when there's on 3 tables
>>and 1 outer join involved. Am I missing something?
>>
>>
>
>Without knowing what you want the query to do, it's difficult to say if
>it's OK to rearrange the join order.
>
>Frequently it's OK to rearrange the join order even without risking any
>change in the query results, but PG doesn't currently have any smarts
>about that, so you have to do it manually by changing the query.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-09-13 18:59:09 Re: Speed problems
Previous Message Ben 2005-09-13 18:54:38 Re: Speed problems