From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql Hosting |
Date: | 2005-09-09 23:21:42 |
Message-ID: | 43221906.6010608@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Various people wrote:
>>> ...PostgreSQL...crontab support...pl/pgsql
I've found that with if you can get 5 companies/users to share a
dedicated server you can be much better off than a hosting plan,
and have full control over the services you run.
I'm sharing with 5 other small businesses a dedicated server with 60GB
hard drive, 700GB monthly bandwidth on a 10Mbps link for $49/month.
This works out to $10/month for each us for 10GB hard drive
and 100GB transfer (quotas we set for ourselves with some
overhead for the OS).
So far I haven't seen any hosted plan offering anything
competitive with that.
The best part is that we can run whatever we want. I
needed postgis; so I ran a separate postgresql install for
a while on a different port until it was stable before
upgrading the rest of the guys. One of the guys had
wierder needs, so he ran his own user-mode linux.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-09 23:23:35 | Re: Cost based SELECT/UPDATE |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-09-09 23:20:21 | Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog |