| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Implement support for TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL |
| Date: | 2005-09-09 00:11:03 |
| Message-ID: | 4320D317.10806@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure if we can issue a notice that will be seen on the client
> side at this point in the startup cycle. I seem to recall the protocol
> document advising against sending NOTICEs during the authentication
> cycle.
As currently written the setsockopt() calls are done very early, well
before even ProcessStartupPacket() has run -- so we can't really send
anything at all to the client because we don't even know which protocol
to use.
Delaying the setsockopt() introduces the danger that you could lose the
network at just the wrong time and have a backend sitting around for an
extended period waiting on a startup packet (but not holding locks,
admittedly).
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-09-09 12:14:36 | Re: [PATCHES] Implement support for TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-09 00:02:23 | Re: [PATCHES] Implement support for TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL (was Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2005-09-09 08:33:36 | Mistake of win32.mak in the Native mode of Windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-09 00:02:23 | Re: [PATCHES] Implement support for TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL (was Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1) |