Re: Cost based SELECT/UPDATE

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Leonid Safronie <evpatoria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cost based SELECT/UPDATE
Date: 2005-09-08 07:11:44
Message-ID: 431FE430.4090704@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Leonid Safronie wrote:
> Hi, ppl
>
> Is there any way to do SELECTs with different priorities?

> The issue is that response time for
> these 50 processes is very important unlike for report generation, and
> time spent by these processes while report running is unacceptable for
> my production environment (response time grows from 1-3 seconds up to
> 1-2 minutes).

The most important question is why response time drops so much? Does it
look like it's disk I/O that's the problem?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Milen A. Radev 2005-09-08 08:31:25 Acting on dropped/timed-out connections
Previous Message Matt 2005-09-08 06:53:05 Bash script to update sequences